Filmed on location in a derelict suburban shopping mall and featuring an ensemble of disabled and non-disabled dancers, the film explores human interdependence, strength, and vulnerability. The film is a re-imagining of the stage work of the same name and dancers Amy Butler, Laura Jones, Chris Pavia, David Willdridge and Dave Toole, who devised the original piece, all appear in the film.
The film is a reimagination of the stage production, which is mandatory study for the GCSE Dance curriculum. To find out more about the stage version, click on the link below.
This film’s cinematic vision speaks to the depth of human experience through the metaphor of a supermarket. The jury responded to the strength of the ensemble and a non-hierarchical vision of corporeal expression
With the dancers moving from anxiety to uncertain joy, the film felt like a summary of the year. It was also a fitting tribute to the inspirational David Toole, who died in October
A lot of hard work has gone in to this work from everyone involved. The film showcases some of the original pioneers of inclusive dance: Artists who are now change-makers, choreographers and masters of their craft
The fragility and tenderness of the dance was a gift to work with. Thanks also to the cinematographer Remko Schnorr for his great work
I know I am trying to tweet less, but just wanted to say I loved Artificial Things by @stopgapdance in @weareunltd @southbankcentre . Well done @joverrent & co. Cracking start to my personal Unlimited festival experience— Tarek Iskander (@TarekIskander1) January 15, 2021
Really liked the dystopian yet affection vibes in @Stopgapdance's Artificial Things. Read my review @The_Upcoming https://t.co/H7YCvIu7QK— Sophia Moss (@EndlessMoss) May 19, 2020
"Artificial Things boldly underlines what we are all yearning for at this moment: the power of physical human connection."— Natasha Sutton Williams (@NatashaPlays) May 22, 2020
My @disabilityarts review of @Stopgapdance's phantasmagoric #ArtificialThings dance filmhttps://t.co/PQcVabfI2A pic.twitter.com/RUP9ruduMq
What a fantastic dance film. Thank you @Stopgapdance for sharing 'Artificial Things' online. I had forgotten how much I like dance for the camera. Amazing location, soundtrack and company of dancers. Bravo.— Kerry Andrews (@kerryjandrews) May 18, 2020
Congratulations @Stopgapdance on a brilliant show. #ArtificialThings A witty, clever, and stylish piece sometimes sad, sometimes funny. Watch it online now#CultureConnectsUs https://t.co/57OhbEg2J9— Orlando Edwards (@orlandoedw) May 18, 2020
Saw this @edinburghfringe at Zoo. One of the best things I've ever seen. Brilliant to be able to see this again. https://t.co/GNvtY7TWZd— Anne Price (@AnniePricey) May 18, 2020
AN INTRODUCTION by Katalin Trencsényi
Artificial Things is a re-imagination of a contemporary dance performance of the same title by Stopgap Dance Company (choreographed by Lucy Bennett and devised by the dancers: Amy Butler, Laura Jones, Chris Pavia, David Willdridge and Dave Toole). Stopgap is a UK-based ensemble, which integrates disabled and non-disabled dancers and artists, operating with a distinctive movement aesthetic, and collaboratively developing work that “seeks to open a window into a parallel world where human interdependence, strength, and vulnerability play out with poetic realism.” Their original, 90-minute dance piece, Artificial Things (2014), gained so many accolades in Britain that it became part of the GCSE curriculum in secondary schools. Hence the genesis of this film: to record an excerpt from the company’s landmark performance with the aim of documenting and preserving an ephemeral artwork.
Having worked with dancer-choreographer Michael Clark in the 1990s (a formative experience that resulted in a film, The Late Michael Clark, 2000), as well as documenting and interpreting one of the most contested performances of les ballets C de la B (VSPRS Show and Tell, 2007), Fiennes in her previous dance-documentaries reveals a filmmaker who not only understands contemporary dance from within but speaks its vocabulary with sensitivity and confidence.
The viewer of Artificial Things (2018), however, is presented with something different from Fiennes’s previous works: a dance film that grew out of the process of documentation, a new artwork in its own right.
Focusing on the second and third part of the dance piece, Fiennes condensed the original 90-minute performance to less than half an hour. During this distillation process, she changed the piece’s dramaturgy and inserted scenes from the first two parts of the original, full-length work. Fiennes then completely re-arranged the scenes (the solo, the duets, and the ensembles), using an artificial logic, a simple principle from mathematics: ordering them in a geometric sequence from one to five, according to the number of dancers in each.
Bennett and Fiennes decided to relocate the space of the original show (a traditional, end-on staging in a theatre) to a non-theatrical, found location–an abandoned shopping mall–and explored the possibilities it offered for re-thinking and re-creating the choreography. With this the mise en scène became a mise en lieu, which completely re-contextualized the original piece, creating a desolate, abandoned, real world for its characters’ dystopian existence.
Fiennes and Bennett in their collaboration further rethought the piece. The markedly theatrical costumes of the original performance (designed by Anna Jones) in the film are replaced with costumes, which use more muted tones. The cream, grey, pastel-blue, soft peach, and brown colors, and the more formal attire recall the aesthetic of the 1950s and evoke some post-war melancholy.
When creating the original dance piece, Bennett and Jones were inspired by the paintings of a contemporary Berlin-based Serbian artist, Goran Djurović. In the film, Bennett and Fiennes further explored this stimulus. The color scheme of the costumes was influenced by the work of Djurović, and the compelling senses of light and space in those paintings were translated into the visual language of the film. Using the found light sources of the space, Fiennes and cinematographer Remko Schnorr paint with the lighting and create a destitute, forlorn atmosphere contrasting darkness with shafts of white light coming from the ceiling, softened occasionally by smoke.
The space plays a vital part in the film: it is a post-apocalyptic, surreal, but charged environment, almost breathing together with the moving figures (somewhat reminiscent of The Zone in Tarkovsky’s Stalker). The glass walls obscured by white paint (to keep out the unwanted gaze), the distressed lino, the bare counter by the hollowed partition walls, the remains of signs, the cracked mirror mended by thick yellow and orange tapes–bear traces of a once abundant and busy life. The soundscape (kept from the original dance piece, created by Andy Higgs and Jim Pinchin) contributes to an industrial, remote and melancholy feeling, giving an impression that here time stands still.
The characters, who appear in this desolate and broken space, are abandoned, lonely, feeble and somewhat frustrated. Archetypical, yet surreal creatures, who like disparate survivors of a catastrophe, slowly come to their senses.
The disabled dancers uncover and display their physicality in a matter-of-fact way, without sentimentalism. It is an unavoidable and perhaps unusual experience for the viewer, but at the same time, it offers a deeper level of connection. The movements (mainly based on the vocabulary of contact improvisation) explore the possibilities of and the boundaries for these bodies–not without a sense of humour. Yet they also express an inner landscape and reveal frustration, aggression, self-hatred, sadness, and affection.
The non-disabled dancers’ duet begins from the cultural topos of a mixed-sex couple’s “lead and follow” movements, yet as it unfolds, the traditional gender roles become more playful and relational, and the dance settles on a tender balance between the partners in weight-bearing and lifts, gently emphasizing the male–female dialogue in equality.
A recurring motif in the choreography is the dialogue (or the lack of it). Through the dancers’ gentle interaction (in the duets and quartets), gradually intimacy and connection develop–until disabled and non-disabled people and a broken wheelchair become one, interconnected union on the ground. From this pulsating group, through a lift, a beautiful, elevated image marks the synthesis, which might be interpreted as a moment of apotheosis or perhaps outstretched arms to the transcendental–but there is nothing, only the cold lights above.
What can become of this unusual group of no-longer strangers? The ending hints at Fiennes’s optimism (utopia?): revealing a deep humanism with a sense of humour that is so characteristic of her work. The film starts and concludes with an empty space. However, what looks like a hopeless end at the beginning becomes a promising beginning at the end.
© Katalin Trencsenyi
Artistic Director & Choreographer
Amy Butler, Laura Jones, Chris Pavia, David Toole, David Willdridge
Performers & Devisors
Anna Jones (Curious Space)
Executive Producer for Stopgap Dance Company
Producer for Stopgap Dance Company
Executive Producer for Lone Star Productions
Producer for Lone Star Productions
The Space and Arts Council England
Old Songs New Songs by John Whitney & Roger Chapman, used by kind permission of Carlin Music Corp
You’d Be So Nice To Come Home To by Cole Porter, used by kind permission of Warner/Chappell Music